Marquee Text Text for Immediate Response 858-663-6884

Annoying or Molesting a Child Under 18 (Penal Code § 647.6) in California

Being charged with annoying or molesting a child under California Penal Code § 647.6 is a serious legal matter that requires immediate attention. Despite the language used in the statute, this offense does not necessarily involve physical contact—it encompasses a wide range of behaviors and can result in either misdemeanor or felony charges.

At Carolyn L. Oliver | Criminal Defense Law Firm, we’ve helped many clients across California navigate these sensitive and high-stakes allegations. If you’re under investigation or have already been charged, understanding the law and your defense options is critical to protecting your future.

What Is Penal Code § 647.6?

California Penal Code § 647.6 makes it a crime to annoy or molest any child under the age of 18. While the terms “annoy” and “molest” are often misunderstood, the law specifically addresses behavior that:

  • Is directed at a person under 18
  • Would bother or disturb a reasonable person
  • Is motivated by an unnatural or abnormal sexual interest in minors

No physical contact is required to violate this statute. The law focuses on the intent and effect of the behavior, particularly when driven by sexual motivations.

Different Violations Under PC § 647.6

Several types of conduct fall under this statute:

  1. Basic Violation (§ 647.6(a)(1))

Involves annoying or molesting an actual child, motivated by abnormal sexual interest.

  1. Attempted Violation Using an Adult Decoy (§ 647.6(a)(2))

Occurs when someone engages in conduct with an adult whom they believe is a child. This often comes up in online sting operations.

  1. Violation After Entering a Home Without Consent (§ 647.6(b))

An enhanced charge for committing the offense after unlawfully entering a residence or building.

  1. Repeat Offenses (§ 647.6(c))

Applies harsher penalties if the defendant has prior convictions—especially for other sex-related offenses involving minors.

What Prosecutors Must Prove

To convict someone under PC § 647.6(a)(1), prosecutors must show beyond a reasonable doubt that:

  • The conduct was directed at a person under 18
  • The conduct was sexually motivated by abnormal interest
  • A normal person would have been disturbed by the conduct
  • The behavior wasn’t related to a legitimate purpose

Proving “sexual motivation” is often the prosecution’s biggest hurdle, as it usually relies on circumstantial evidence.

What Qualifies as “Annoying or Molesting”?

The following types of behavior may be charged under PC § 647.6:

  • Making inappropriate or sexually suggestive remarks to a minor
  • Repeatedly watching, following, or interacting with a child
  • Engaging in explicit conversations
  • Indecent exposure toward a minor
  • Making obscene gestures
  • Attempting to solicit sexual acts

The court will consider the total context, including how the behavior was perceived and the evidence of intent.

Penalties for Violating PC § 647.6

First Offense (Basic Violation)

  • Misdemeanor
  • Up to 1 year in county jail
  • Fines up to $5,000

Entering a Dwelling

  • Misdemeanor or felony, depending on circumstances
  • Felony: Possible state prison time

Repeat or Prior Offenders

  • Felony
  • 2, 4, or 6 years in state prison
  • Lifetime impact including mandatory sex offender registration

Additional Consequences

  • Tier 1 sex offender registration (minimum 10 years)
  • Immigration complications
  • Job and housing restrictions
  • Probation conditions including mandatory counseling

How This Differs from Other Sex Offenses

PC § 647.6 vs. PC § 288 (Lewd Acts with a Minor)

  • PC § 288 requires physical touching, while PC § 647.6 does not.
  • PC § 288 is generally punished more severely.

PC § 647.6 vs. PC § 314 (Indecent Exposure)

  • PC § 314 is about exposing genitals in public.
  • PC § 647.6 is broader and based on sexual motivation.

PC § 647.6 vs. PC § 273a (Child Endangerment)

  • PC § 273a addresses placing a child in danger.
  • PC § 647.6 addresses sexually motivated behavior.

Common Defense Strategies

Lack of Sexual Motivation

If your conduct was not sexually motivated, this key element fails.

Reasonable Conduct

The behavior must be objectively disturbing. Some behavior may seem strange but is not criminal.

Mistake of Age

In online sting cases, the belief that the individual was 18 or older may be a defense.

False Accusations

Custody disputes or interpersonal conflicts can lead to fabricated claims.

Constitutional Violations

Illegally obtained evidence or violations of your rights (like unlawful searches or coerced confessions) can be challenged.

Special Considerations in Sting Operations

PC § 647.6(a)(2) covers interactions with undercover officers posing as minors. Possible defenses include:

  • Entrapment: If law enforcement induced the crime
  • Lack of belief: If you didn’t believe the person was underage
  • No sexual motivation: If there was no sexual content or intent in your actions

Probation & Counseling Requirements

If convicted and granted probation under PC § 647.6(d), the court may impose:

  • Mandatory psychological counseling
  • No-contact orders
  • Restrictions on residence and internet use
  • Community service
  • Regular probation reporting

Investigation Process

These cases usually begin with a report from a parent, teacher, or witness. Key stages include:

  • Witness interviews and forensic interviews with the child
  • Evidence collection (texts, emails, surveillance, etc.)
  • Police interrogations (always have legal counsel present)

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I be charged if there was no physical contact?
Yes. The law does not require touching—just disturbing conduct with sexual motivation.

Does the child have to feel disturbed?
No. The standard is whether a reasonable person would feel disturbed.

Can these charges be reduced or dismissed?
Yes, depending on the evidence and defense strategy. Diversion, reduction, or dismissal may be possible.

Do I have to register as a sex offender?
Most convictions under this statute require Tier 1 registration, which typically lasts 10 years.

Why You Need a Skilled Criminal Defense Attorney

Facing allegations under PC § 647.6 is life-altering. These cases demand a defense attorney who understands the law’s nuances and how to effectively dismantle the prosecution’s arguments. At Carolyn L. Oliver | Criminal Defense Law Firm, we bring:

  • Experience defending PC § 647.6 charges
  • In-depth knowledge of California sex crime laws
  • Strategic planning tailored to your unique situation
  • Familiarity with local courts and prosecutors
  • Access to expert witnesses and forensic specialists

Talk to a California Criminal Defense Lawyer Today

If you or someone you love is facing charges under Penal Code § 647.6, don’t wait to take action. These cases move quickly, and early legal intervention can dramatically impact the outcome.

📞 Contact Carolyn L. Oliver | Criminal Defense Law Firm today for a confidential case evaluation. Let us help you understand your rights, explore your legal options, and start building a strong defense.

Disclaimer:

The information in this blog is for informational and marketing purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing or interacting with this post does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Every case is unique, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

 

Subscribe to get the latest new

Don’t miss out on exciting updates, tips, and insights.